Press room ... 1996 archive
Project Inform Support for
Accelerated Approval of Ritonavir
February 29, 1996
San Francisco, CA—Project Inform today announced
its support for accelerated approval of the Abbott protease inhibitor
ritonavir (Norvir) for all HIV-infected people for whom therapy
is indicated. Due to many unanswered questions about the use of
the drug, Project Inform did not support the manufacturer’s
request for “traditional” approval, an FDA mechanism
which would not technically require any confirmatory studies or
a secondary review by the FDA. Project Inform Founding Director
Martin Delaney commented, “This is truly a very promising
drug but we feel that the research about how to use it has only
begun. In our view the study data submitted in support of ‘traditional’
or ‘full’ approval does not warrant an unqualified endorsement
and may in fact lead to widespread misuse of the drug.”
Abbott Laboratories, maker of ritonavir, submitted a study in which
either the drug or a placebo was given to people with advanced HIV
disease, for use in addition to whatever other therapy, if any,
the patients chose to use. Used in this fashion, the manufacturer
reported that the drug produced slightly less than a 43% reduction
in the death rate and a 58% reduction in the rate of new infections
or death after four months of use. “While this outcome is
significant,” Delaney continued, “it overlooks two other
important facts from the study. It is our understanding that the
majority of the deaths reported in this data occurred within the
first six weeks of treatment, raising questions as to whether the
outcome reflects the true longer-term effect of the drug. More importantly,
we are very concerned that the data shows a rapid loss of antiviral
activity, probably due to the development of drug resistance, within
six months when used in this fashion. Since resistance to this drug
confers resistance to most other protease inhibitors, there is good
reason to fear that such a use of the drug may lead only to short-term
benefit followed quickly by long-term multi-drug cross resistance
to many of the key products in the field of protease inhibitors.
There is evidence that the drug can work far better when used properly;
giving too much weight to this data may promote use of the drug
in this sub optimal fashion.”
Ben Cheng of Project Inform added, “In light of this, along
with other concerns about the large number of drug interactions
and the lack of any long-term safety database with this drug, it
seems premature and unnecessary to grant traditional or full approval.
We gain nothing from ‘full’ approval. The accelerated
approval mechanism will provide full access to the drug while also
requiring a second look after additional data is collected. We should
also be very sensitive to the fact that this is the first major
anti-HIV drug to seek approval without having any meaningful period
of expanded access, which is our usual first source of real world
safety data in large numbers of people. At this point, less than
500 people have been on the drug for longer than 6 months.”
Aside from the question of the approval mechanism, Project Inform
expressed great hope for ritonavir and other drugs in this class.
“Clearly,” said Ben Cheng, “protease inhibitors
are the most powerful tool we have yet seen for suppressing HIV
viral activity. We have never before seen drugs which can produce
this level of short-term effects, and at least when the drugs are
used properly, there is every reason to believe that long-term effects
can be sustained.”
Project Inform believes that data from any of the individual protease
inhibitor drugs should not be assessed in a vacuum, but in the context
of all the data from the study of similar drugs. Other studies clearly
demonstrate that when used alone as single agents, protease inhibitors
can quickly induce the development of resistance, and that resistance
to some drugs, such as ritonavir or indinavir, confers cross-resistance
to most other protease inhibitors. Because of this problem, the
most significant data submitted thus far by all manufacturers favored
the use of protease inhibitors in carefully selected three drug
combinations. Delaney said “The three drug combinations have
consistently shown the largest and best sustained suppression of
virus and viral resistance, as well as the best improvement in immunologic
markers. Therefore, we think it is critical that Abbott make clear
to physicians and patients that great care should be employed in
how these drugs are used. Simply adding them without thought to
existing therapy is unlikely to produce a lasting benefit, while
running a large risk of creating multi-drug cross resistant strains
of virus. This has implications for the individual and for the public
health as well, since this cross-resistant virus could be transmitted
to others.”
Project Inform urges Abbott Laboratories to collaborate with the
Federal government and other manufacturers in a broad new program
of clinical trials designed to answer the many questions now raised
by the advent of this new generation of more powerful therapies.