In the news ... 2008
Trimeris to shut down R&D, focus on TRI-1144
by Paul Dalton
January 10, 2008
Trimeris Pharmaceuticals announced it is shutting down all new
product research and development and will focus its efforts on
its experimental entry inhibitor, TRI-1144. They plan to file an
Investigational New Drug application for TRI-1144 with the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) early in 2008, and begin phase I
clinical studies soon after.
This decision to end new product development
is risky for Trimeris. They have yet to study TRI-1144 in humans.
Many drugs that look promising in pre-clinical research fail when
given to people. This decision leaves the small company with no
back-up compound, or program to develop one, if TRI-1144 fails.
Trimeris
originally developed the fusion inhibitor Fuzeon (enfuvirtide)
and partnered with Roche for its manufacturing and marketing. In
2007, the companies announced they would no longer work together
on the R&D of new drugs.
This latest development follows a series
of setbacks for Trimeris. In addition to severing its relationship
with industry giant Roche, the company underwent major restructuring.
As reported here, they
failed to gain FDA approval for a needleless injection system for
Fuzeon. Lastly, the approvals of Selzentry (maraviroc) and Isentress
(raltegravir)—along
with the imminent approval of Intelence (etravirine, TMC-125)—have
likely reduced the need for Fuzeon by people with extensive treatment
experience.
Data on TRI-1144 have been reported at several conferences
over the past two years. Like Fuzeon, it blocks HIV’s entry
into immune system cells by blocking the viral protein, gp41.
As with Fuzeon, it must be injected. However, lab testing suggests
it may be given as little as once a week. TRI-1144 also appears
likely to cause fewer site reactions than enfuvirtide, a major
concern for many, as well as appears to have a high barrier to
resistance while remaining active against HIV that has become resistant
to enfuvirtide.
Project Inform sees
this as a setback: yet another example of the anticipated but troubling
industry-wide slow-down of HIV drug development. While the last
few years have witnessed a bumper crop of important new treatment
options, the next few years look thin. New drugs like Isentress
and Selzentry, along with older options like Prezista (darunavir)
and Fuzeon, have helped many people with highly drug-resistant
HIV to reach undetectable levels of HIV, often for the first time.
History
has shown us that however good these new drugs are, they are not
going to work forever for this group of people. New treatment options
will be needed for this medically vulnerable group. Today, there’s
one fewer company working on the much needed next generation of
HIV drug.