Coverage of 2007 ICAAC
(Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy)
September 17–20, 2007, Chicago, Illinois
Early study results of etravirine showing promise
September 18, 2007
Results from a pivotal study of the experimental non-nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine (TMC-125) were
presented at the 47th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial
Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) being held in Chicago. The study
found etravirine to be effective and well tolerated. Etravirine
is being developed by Tibotec Therapeutics as a second generation
NNRTI for people with resistance to the other NNRTIs, like Sustiva
(efavirenz) and Viramune (nevirapine).
The combined results from two studies, called DUET 1 and 2, were
presented. In these studies, people with documented resistance to
the current NNRTIs, as well as 3 or more mutations from protease
inhibitors (PI) were randomly assigned to take either etravirine
or placebo. Everyone also took an optimized background therapy of
the PI Prezista (darunavir) boosted with Norvir (ritonavir) and
the best available NRTIs. Volunteers were able to use Fuzeon (enfuvirtide,
T20) if they chose to.
The people who enrolled in the study (over 1,200 in all) were highly
treatment experienced. Two-thirds of them had taken 10–15
anti-HIV drugs before the study. Nearly half had no more than one
active drug available to them, as determined by phenotypic resistance
testing. The participants were mostly male (90%) and Caucasian (70%).
After 24 weeks of the study which will last 48 weeks, 59% of people
taking etravirine had HIV levels below 50 copies compared to 41%
on placebo. The difference was larger for people with fewer available
drugs. When one drug was available, 60% of people on etravirine
had viral loads below 50 vs. 30% on placebo. When resistance testing
showed no active drugs, 45% of people on etravirine had undetectable
HIV levels, compared to only 8% on placebo. CD4 cell counts increased
more (86 vs. 67 cells/mL) for people taking etravirine as well.
People taking etravirine averaged a drop in HIV levels of 2.4 logs
(over 99%) vs. 1.7 logs (around 96%) reduction for placebo. Viral
loads were reduced the most in people with fewer NNRTI mutations.
Between 60–75% of people with two or fewer NNRTI mutations
had HIV levels below 50 copies, compared to 25–48% for placebo.
A significant drop-off occurred for people with 3 or more mutations,
with 25–41% of people taking etravirine reaching HIV levels
below 50 copies vs. 17–25% on placebo.
The major side effect for etravirine was rash, which occurred in
17% of people. The rash most often started within the first two
weeks of treatment and lasted about 11 days. Most rashes were mild
to moderate, with only 1.3% considered serious. Only 2.2% of people
stopped treatment due to rash. Rash was more common in women (although
the number of women was small), and there was no connection seen
between pre-treatment CD4 cell counts or history of NNRTI rash.
Etravirine is currently available to people who need it to construct
a viable regimen through an expanded access program. Physicians
can find out more by calling 1-866-889-2074 or by emailing
the program. The drug is likely to be approved early in 2008.
These are encouraging results for a much needed drug. The NNRTI
class has been hampered by the high degree of cross resistance among
the drugs. In most cases, when someone develops resistance to one
NNRTI, their HIV is also resistant to the others. Etravirine was
designed to overcome this resistance. It could provide an important
option for people who don’t have any options for NNRTIs.