![]() |
||||||
PI Perspective #17December 1995 View PDF En español Medicaid Cuts Threaten Care for People with AIDSThe 104th Congress has called for cuts in Medicaid, one of the most critical lifelines for people with HIV/AIDS. Both the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives have proposed a $170 billion cut to Medicaid over the next seven years as part of the Congressional budget resolution. This is a 30% reduction from projected spending under current law. These spending reductions are, in part, being used to fund a $245 billion tax cut, also included in the Budget Reconciliation bill, which will disproportionately benefit corporations and wealthy Americans. In addition, Congress has proposed eliminating the present guarantee that all people who meet state and federal eligibility guidelines will receive health care coverage. President Clinton, who has promised to veto this bill, has also proposed cuts to the program, totaling $54 billion over ten years. One of the arguments used to support this “reform” of both Medicare and Medicaid is that the proposed cuts are the only way to ensure that the programs will not go bankrupt in the future. However, to reduce funding for this program without addressing the underlying causes of increasing health care costs will result in weaker health services for people with AIDS, other people with disabilities, and low income people. It will also lead to more use of inadequate and costly emergency care services. To achieve the goal of the Republican budget reconciliation proposal, 53% of the proposed $894 billion in federal reductions comes from health and human services programs. What is Medicaid? People with HIV/AIDS depend heavily on this program, which provides $3 billion annually to HIV-positive individuals. Medicaid provides basic health care services to 90% of all children with HIV and for at least 40% of adults with AIDS. Medicaid has become the only form of health care coverage available to many people living with HIV/AIDS because of discrimination, preexisting conditions, decreased income, lifetime coverage limits, and other practices by private insurance companies. Medicaid and Block Grants This mechanism would also remove the “entitlement” status of the program, meaning that all those eligible may not receive coverage. For example, if a state used up the allotted block grant funding and still had people in need of coverage, there would be no additional funding. Consumers Union estimates that 12 million Americans will lose their health insurance coverage under the current proposal. In addition, because the federal government typically attaches few requirements to block grants, the comprehensiveness, accessibility, quality, affordability, or cultural competency of services is not ensured. Supporters of the block grant approach say that Medicaid is more wasteful than other health care programs and that it has been a major cause of health care inflation. In reality, the major increases in Medicaid spending are largely attributable to two factors: 1) an increase in the number of persons eligible to receive Medicaid due to losing other insurance coverage, and 2) disproportionate share payments. These payments support health care facilities serving large numbers of uninsured persons. For example, San Francisco General Hospital receives 77% of its funding to provide services to the poor and indigent through Medicaid and Medicare, reflecting in part disproportionate share payments. When the two factors outlined above are excluded, the rate of growth for Medicaid is comparable to increases in other forms of medical spending. Effects of Medicaid Cuts Action is Needed |
CONTENTSFour New Concepts for Combating HIV Benefits of Combination Therapy Confirmed Medicaid Cuts Threaten People with HIV HIV Infection & “Managed Care” |
|||||
|
© 2008 Project Inform 1375 Mission
Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 415-558-8669 |
||||||