PI Action alerts & updates ... 2002
Bush Administration HIV/AIDS Report Card
The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President:
Each day, America is making brave and demonstrable progress in
the war on terrorism and on efforts to improve the nation’s
economy. However, the war on HIV/AIDS is now entering its third
decade. There are now more than 40 million people living with HIV/AIDS
worldwide and more than 21 million have died.
Our message is simple: We need your leadership to help end this
human suffering and death.
There are few other issues facing our nation and the world that
need your immediate attention and support, and that of your Administration,
more than that of ending the toll of HIV/AIDS. As the Presidential
Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS holds its first meeting, and as Congressional
hearings on your proposed FY 2003 Budget get underway, we submit
for your review the attached assessment of your Administration’s
record on HIV/AIDS to date.
We urge you to give priority consideration to three items:
Your strong commitment to increased funding for programs and services
that provide hope and health to people living with HIV/AIDS at home
and abroad;
Rapid progress on the appointments of health experts in critical
positions that are now vacant, especially those at the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration, Health
Resources and Services Administration, and National Institutes of
Health;
A meeting between you, key officials in your Administration, and
AIDS advocates regarding the many issues relating to AIDS in the
third decade.
It is our strong desire to work with you and your Administration
on these matters and others in the struggle to end this epidemic.
Sincerely,
American Academy of HIV Medicine
AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts
AIDS Foundation of Chicago
AIDS Project Los Angeles
AIDS Services of Dallas
AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition
CAEAR Coalition
Columbus AIDS Task Force
Critical Path AIDS Project
Florida AIDS Action
Gay Men’s Health Crisis
Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund
Lifelong AIDS Alliance
Minnesota AIDS Project
National AIDS Housing Coalition
National Association of People with AIDS
National Gay & Lesbian Task Force
National Minority AIDS Council
Project Inform
Provincetown AIDS Support Group
San Francisco AIDS Foundation
Seattle Treatment Education Project
Tri-County AIDS Consortium of Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard
and Nantucket
Whitman-Walker Clini
Press release can be seen here, or PDF
Report card PDF
Report Card
President George W. Bush
Subject: AIDS
As the Bush Administration’s Presidential Advisory Council
on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) convenes, national, regional and local HIV/AIDS
organizations have come together and find that President George
W. Bush and his Administration are not making the grade in providing
the strong leadership, coordinated national strategy and funding
necessary to combat the AIDS epidemic both at home and abroad. With
40 million people in the world living with HIV, the AIDS epidemic
remains an urgent “national security issue” that must
be addressed at the highest levels of the federal government.
Funding Leadership
Care D D
Housing C – C
Minority HIV/AIDS Initiative D – D –
Prevention D F
Research B + D
Global C – C
Executive Office of the President N/A D +
We urge you to give priority consideration to three items immediately:
- Your strong commitment to increased funding for programs and
services that provide hope and health to people living with HIV/AIDS
at home and abroad;
- Rapid progress on the appointments of health experts in critical
positions that are now vacant, especially those at the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration,
Health Resources Services Administration, and National Institutes
of Health; and
- A meeting between you, key officials in your Administration,
and AIDS advocates regarding the many issues relating to AIDS
in the third decade.
Everyday in the United States 110 people are infected with HIV,
and 50 percent of those infected are young people under the age
of 24. While African Americans and Latinos make up 31 percent of
the U.S. population, they account for an estimated 70 percent of
new HIV infections. AIDS is disproportionately impacting women of
color and men who have sex with men, and increasingly impacting
older Americans and low-income persons. HIV is an issue of homeland
security.
The HIV/AIDS epidemic requires a comprehensive, coordinated national
strategy, adequate funding, and strong leadership at the highest
levels of government. Numerous factors—including toxic, complicated,
and expensive drug regimens; growing HIV and AIDS caseloads at home
and abroad; and the lack of widespread, frank prevention programs—require
a greater national commitment today than ever before.
The challenges faced by Americans—those living with HIV/AIDS,
and the millions more who are affected by this disease—are
opportunities for this Administration to build on our nation’s
reputation for leadership and resolve. As our nation invests in
protecting our borders from the threat of terrorist attacks, this
Administration must commit the same vigor, leadership and resources
to protect Americans and other nations of the world from the terrors
of the AIDS epidemic.
Care Funding
With preliminary reports from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) showing that the number of new AIDS cases increased
in the United States by 8 percent last year and medical inflation
reaching 11 percent, community-based AIDS service organizations
around the country face significant challenges in their efforts
to increase access to comprehensive care with less funding. When
medical inflation is taken into consideration, flat funding the
Ryan White CARE Act programs, as twice proposed by the Bush Administration,
has the affect of reducing or eliminating care and treatment to
nearly 16,000 individuals currently receiving care under this program.
By not increasing funding for the CARE Act, it is also estimated
that 27,000 of the 40,000 individuals infected by HIV annually in
the United States will not be able to turn to federally-supported
care.
The Administration’s budget provides no new funding for the
AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) while thousands of low-income
persons living with HIV are waiting to access life-prolonging drugs
through ADAP. Despite the billions of dollars invested in developing
important AIDS drugs, escalating drug prices and no additional federal
investment will force states to deny access to these essential drugs.
With states facing serious shortfalls in their respective state
Medicaid budgets, the Administration has yet to show support for
an increase in the federal Medicaid contribution, forcing states
t o reduce coverage, services and prescription benefits. This could
threaten the care and treatment of the 30 percent of persons living
with HIV/AIDS in the U.S. receiving essential medical services through
Medicaid.
Leadership
The Administration has failed to show any leadership in reforming
Medicaid to ensure that low-income individuals whose HIV disease
has not yet progressed to AIDS are eligible for the program so that
they can benefit from early treatment. The Department of Health
and Human Services has not led efforts to expand services covered
by Medicaid or worked with states to reach eligible individuals
and enroll them in Medicaid.
Housing Funding
President Bush has twice requested modest increases for the Housing
Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) program. The FY 2002
request allowed the Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) to fund newly eligible localities without major disruption
to existing programs, but still leaves thousands of people living
with HIV/AIDS homeless or marginally housed.
The proposed 5 percent increase for HOPWA in FY 2003 is an improvement,
however, the overall HUD budget is flat-funded after accounting
for renewal of expiring Section 8 vouchers. Characterized as increases,
the renewal funds do not produce a single new slot for eligible
individuals or families. The budget also flat funds other key programs
for low-income, homeless people with HIV/AIDS, including Shelter
Plus Care and Section 811.
Leadership
HUD Secretary Mel Martinez and Deputy Secretary Roy Bernardi have
publicly stated their support for expansion of federal housing for
underserved, disabled populations, including low-income people with
HIV/AIDS. Unfortunately, President Bush has largely ignored the
federal government’s responsibility to provide housing support
for low-income, marginally housed working families and homeless
individuals, including many who are living with HIV/AIDS.
Minority HIV/AIDS Initiative Funding
An estimated 70 percent of all new HIV infections are among African
Americans and Latinos, though they comprise only 31 percent of the
U.S. population. Yet, for two consecutive years President Bush has
requested no new funds for the Minority HIV/AIDS Initiative (MHAI).
Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have
undermined this critical initiative by failing to follow “congressional
intent” and AIDS community efforts to target MHAI resources
to indigenous, minority, community-based organizations within communities
of color. As HIV infections and new AIDS cases increasingly devastate
communities of color in the United States, Presidential inaction
on the domestic HIV/AIDS state of emergency in communities of color
is unconscionable.
Leadership
Despite promising statements from HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson about
the Administration’s commitment to eliminating health disparities
and improving health access for people of color, he has not followed
up that rhetoric with action. President Bush has done nothing substantive
to support the MHAI. Indeed, the President himself has yet to publicly
acknowledge the AIDS crisis in communities of color, which continues
to disproportionately impact women, gay men and youth.
Prevention Funding
While the CDC has set a goal of reducing HIV infections by 50 percent
by 2005, the Administration has failed to provide the resources
to the CDC and community-based organizations to achieve such an
important and necessary goal.
With the CDC’s recent report that the number of HIV infections
in the United States is increasing, it is irresponsible for the
Administration not to make a significant commitment to increasing
the nation’s investment in HIV prevention. With half of all
new infections in young people under the age of 24, a substantial
influx of federal resources is necessary to protect a generation
from HIV that has never experienced the real suffering and death
associated with AIDS. The federal government must invest significantly
more resources to enhance the quality and scope of locally planned
and targeted prevention programs that respond to the particular
needs of populations at greatest risk for infection including African
Americans, Latinos and gay and bisexual men.
Leadership
In the past year, the Bush Administration has actively undermined
effective HIV prevention programs. The Administration failed to
endorse and develop prevention policies and programs based upon
the findings of “The Surgeon General’s Call to Action
to Promote Sexual Health and Responsible Sexual Behavior.”
In addition, the Administration has attacked comprehensive, locally
tailored HIV prevention programs. The ultimate goals and scope of
an Administration-driven review of all HIV/AIDS programs, including
prevention programs, remains unclear and undefined.
The public health community shares grave concern over this Administration’s
strong and vocal support for abstinence-only and abstinence-until-marriage
programs to the exclusion of comprehensive prevention messages that
include a discussion about and access to contraceptives.
This Administration continues to support a federal ban on harm
reduction programs, including needle exchange programs that have
been affirmed by the Institute of Medicine. President Bush has maintained
the Clinton Administration directive prohibiting the use of federal
funds to support needle exchange programs and has endorsed a similar
ban on the use of District of Columbia funds in the Administration’s
FY 2002 and FY 2003 budgets.
Research Funding
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the backbone of the nation’s
AIDS research initiative and President Bush’s support for
doubling of the entire NIH budget is critical and supported. However,
allocation of these funds must be based on scientific opportunity.
The consolidated AIDS research budget, which is required by law
and provides for a comprehensive AIDS research portfolio, must also
be included in the final NIH budget.
Leadership
President Bush has left the NIH, the NIH’s Office of AIDS
Research and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) without leadership
for over a year while qualified candidates sit by. Both the NIH
positions are key to the success of the nation’s comprehensive
AIDS research effort, including the development of effective, better-tolerated
treatments, more evidence-based approaches to care and new prevention
strategies including vaccines and microbicides. The FDA director
is key to the scientific review and marketing approval for new AIDS
drugs and treatments.
The AIDS community applauds the President in announcing in his
FY 2003 budget a long-awaited increase at NIH on microbicides, women
and HIV, and HIV prevention. The AIDS community eagerly awaits the
opportunity to work with the Administration in identifying the direction
of such research and resources.
While the AIDS community recognizes the president’s efforts
in coordinating the federal government’s AIDS vaccine research,
it stands concerned that the transfer of the Department of Defense’s
(DOD) entire HIV research program to the NIH may compromise the
flexibility and uniqueness of the DOD program.
Global Programs Funding
Although the United States was first to pledge funds to the Global
Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the initial $200 million
pledge was meager compared to the $7 to $10 billion needed annually
to address the global pandemic. The U.S. contribution sent a poor
message to other countries, and as a result contributions have been
far less than expected. United Nation’s Secretary-General
Kofi Annan has called for the United States to contribute $1 billion
to the fund. The Bush Administration must make sure that our global
response to HIV/AIDS does not come at the expense of other critical
international or domestic health programs. Unfortunately, President
Bush’s FY 2003 budget includes less than $900 million for
international HIV/AIDS programs, including only $200 million for
the global fund. The United States remains on the bottom of the
list of developed nations when considering our international foreign
aid contribution as compared to total gross domestic product.
Leadership
The Administration’s leadership on global AIDS issues has
been mixed. Secretary of State Colin Powell deserves great credit
for making global AIDS issues a priority and delivering important
public statements about the pandemic’s devastating consequences
and the need to speak frankly about condom use. We applaud the Administration
for recognizing the importance of HIV/AIDS at USAID by elevating
the HIV/AIDS division to an office and increasing its budget and
staff resources. The Administration’s role in ensuring that
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are funded by the global fund
is also noteworthy. In contrast, some in the Administration have
questioned the ability to provide treatment in the developing world
and have attempted to limit developing countries’ ability
to manufacture their own versions of HIV treatments or import cheaper
generic versions. By re-instating a policy that prohibits NGOs that
provide comprehensive family planning services from receiving U.S.
funds, President Bush weakens HIV prevention efforts abroad.
Executive Office of the President Leadership
After a strong public outcry, the Administration decided to keep
the Office of National AIDS Policy (ONAP) and subsequently named
Scott Evertz, an openly gay man, to serve as ONAP’s director.
While Mr. Evertz has been visible in the HIV/AIDS community, it
remains unclear how much influence and authority ONAP has on the
development and support of sound HIV/AIDS policies within this Administration
and the White House. We also stand concerned that the community
has not been given the opportunity to have an open dialogue with
key policy staff at the White House Office of Domestic Policy and
the Office of Management and Budget to discuss the Administration’s
comprehensive HIV and AIDS strategy, or lack thereof.
The mission and clear commitment of the White House Task Force
on HIV/AIDS, jointly chaired by Secretaries Powell and Thompson,
to develop a coordinated and comprehensive strategy for addressing
HIV/AIDS in the United States and internationally remain unclear
and undefined. While the Task Force provides a promising forum for
the formation of the Bush Administration’s HIV/AIDS policies
across agencies, it has truly been underutilized to date.
We stand concerned that a number of key appointments important
to HIV/AIDS programs have not been made by the Administration including
the Surgeon General, the Director of the CDC’s National Center
for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, the Director of the CDC’s
Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, and the Director of the Office
of HIV and AIDS Policy within HHS.
While the HIV/AIDS community commends the Administration for retaining
the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA), we are concerned
that a number of individuals appointed to the council have public
track records of supporting HIV/AIDS policies that are at odds with
science, public health experts, people living with HIV/AIDS and
community-based providers and have made statements viewed as homophobic
and discrediting sound, proven HIV prevention strategies.