PI Action alerts & updates ... 1997
Fiscal Year 1998 Appropriations Update
The House/Senate Conference Committee has completed its work on
funding levels for HIV/AIDS programs for Fiscal Year 1998. The appropriations
bill must be approved by the full House and Senate and then sent
to President Clinton for his signature or veto.
The final bill does contain some significant increases for HIV/AIDS
programs. Most notably, the committee approved a $118.5 million
increase for the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP). While the
$118.5 million increase is significant, it does fall short of the
$132 million identified as needed to bring state ADAPs to a MINIMUM
level of service. We will keep you informed of continuing problems
with state ADAPs and ways you can advocate at the state and federal
level for increased funding.
The final appropriations bill also calls for a $439 million increase
for the Ryan White CARE Act, a $17 million increase for HIV prevention
programs, and a $105 million increase for AIDS research at the National
Institutes of Health. If you are interested in a complete breakdown
in HIV/AIDS funding, contact Project Inform’s policy department
at TAN@projectinform.org or 415-558-8669.
The conference committee has also finalized an agreement on the
needle exchange issue. The House appropriations bill contained an
amendment which would have eliminated the Secretary of Health and
Human Services’ authority to lift the ban on federal funding
for needle exchange programs, while the Senate bill retained this
authority.
The committee agreed to a provision which retains the Secretary’s
authority but institutes a six month moratorium (until March 31,
1998) on using the authority. While it is good news that the issue
has been removed from the appropriations process, it is important
to continue communicating support for these life-saving programs
to the Clinton Administration and to Congress. Look for upcoming
TAN alerts for sample letters to send to these federal officials.
Finally, thank you to everyone who wrote, called and met with their
elected representatives this year on these issues. These funding
increases in a climate of decreased prioritization for health care
spending is the result of sustained grassroots advocacy by individuals
most affected by these programs!